30.3.09

Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping-Pathology Protocol in Breast Cancer.

Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping-Pathology Protocol.
Sentinel lymph node mapping is now performed on selected patients who opt for conservative surgery to treat their breast cancer.
The procedure involves the surgical identification of those axillary lymph nodes that theoretically would be the first ‘‘sentinel’’ nodes to receive the lymphatic drainage from the breast harboring the invasive cancer. If these nodes are pathologically negative, the patient is spared the morbidity associated with a standard axillary node dissection.

Surgical identification is based on the peritumoral injection of radioactive solutions and/or colored dyes. The surgeon then massages the breast to facilitate permeation of the solution into the lymphatic system. Several hours after the injection, the patient is taken to the operating room, where the surgeon uses a radioactive counter to locate the ‘‘hot’’ lymph node. If a colored dye has been used, visual inspection of the axilla usually identifies the sentinel lymph node. Usually, the pathologist receives 1 to 3 lymph nodes for evaluation.

Some centers use cytologic imprints, either with or without frozen section evaluation,at the time of surgery to determine whether the sentinel node is involved by metastatic tumor. If the imprintsare positive, then the surgeon proceeds to an axillary node dissection. Other hospitals submit their sentinel lymph node biopsies for routine processing without intraoperative consultation.
Once the specimen is received in the pathology laboratory, the pathologist must carefully dissect out all the nodes and record the number and sizes. If it is technically feasible, each node should be serially sectioned at 2- to 3-mm intervals, parallel to the long axis, and entirely submitted for evaluation. One hematoxylineosin–stained section should be cut from each block for light microscopy. Additional unstained levels may also be requested at the time of sectioning, in the event that immunohistochemical analysis of the node will be required to confirm the diagnosis of metastatic disease. Although some studies advocate using immunohistochemistry on all histologically negative lymph nodes, the current College of American Pathologists guidelines state that this procedure is not the standard of care for pathologic evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with invasive breast cancer.

Metastasis and prognosis
Macrometastases (>2 mm) have a clear influence on prognosis
Micrometastases (>0.2 mm, < or =" 2">

References:
Cserni G. Evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Histopathology 2005;46:697–702.
Weaver DL. Pathological evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer: a practical academic perspective from America. Histopathology 2005;46:702–6.
Bobrow L, Pinder S. Histopathology and the SLN. In: Sentinel lymph node biopsy handbook—NEW START. London: RoyalCollege of Surgeons of England; 2004. p. 88–94.

2 comments:

Sara Struthers said...

I understand that an ounce of prevention is worth a ton of cure, but the thing is that no one knows for sure just how far out we are from finding a cure. In the mean time though, I think it's more important to focus on the tasks at hand - for instance, methods of treatment for those who already have it. Having survived breast cancer myself, I found it a little frustrating that there was this relatively huge amount of support for breast cancer research, and little for those who are currently suffering. It's not that I don't appreciate all these donation commercials and pink ribbon stickers for your car and what not, but those do nothing for the ones like me, who have already undergone treatment, and are now focusing on breast reconstruction and getting their lives back.

Anonymous said...

thanks

List of all the posts

Interesting Case

Clinical History:

53 years male,History of hypertension and tachycardia,MRI abdomen:-Left adrenal mass:- size 5.8 cm Right renal mass:- size-3.0cm Microscopic examination of the renal mass showed vascular tumor with diffuse sheets of clear cells having Fuhrman grade III nuclei. There was no evidence of necrosis within the tumor. There was no evidence of extraparenchymal invasion.
Gross examination of the left adrenal gland revealed cortically centered, solid and multinodular mass measuring 6.5 x 6.0 x 5.0 cm and weighing 122 grams. The tumor was encapsulated but showed evidence of extraparenchymal penetration. The tumor had golden brown cut surface with areas of hemorrhage and necrosis. The partial nephrectomy showed 3.0cm x 3.0cm x 3.0 cm yellow solid mass which did not invade into the perinephric adipose tissue.
Microscopically, the adrenal mass had predominant diffuse sheets and focal trabecular arrangements. The former pattern was present in about third of tumor. The cells had clear cytoplasm and round to ovoid nuclei with conspicuous nucleoli. Mitotic rate was 9/50 HPF and included atypical forms. Gross necrosis and capsular invasion were documented microscopically. There was no evidence of lymphovascular invasion. Considering the above mentioned features, a Weiss histopathologic score2 of 7/9 was applied.



Discussion:

The differential diagnosis included Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) with contralateral adrenal metastasis, Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) with contralateral renal metastasis, synchronous RCC and ACC or synchronous RCC and adrenocortical adenoma. A panel of immunohistochemical stains was performed to sort out the diagnosis. Adrenal tumor demonstrated strong Vimentin positivity and is negative for CK7, CK20, E1/AE3, EMA, Synaptophysin and S100.Renal cell carcinoma was positive for CK7, AE1/AE3, EMA (weak) and Vimentin. It was negative for CK20, Synaptophysin and S100. The difference of immunoprofile between the two tumors documented that they originated from two different primaries.

Final Diagnosis:

The diagnosis of synchronous RCC and ACC rather than metastasis influences the prognosis.

Prognosis:

The longest disease free interval after removal of contralateral adrenal metastasis was 12.1 years8 and the longest crude survival was 14.3 years. In contrast non metastazing RCC has an excellent prognosis if no metastasis developed.