12.3.09

HER2/neu Marker in Breast Cancer

Quality Management Requirements for HER2/neu Marker in Breast Cancer
Recommendations of the HER2/neu Advisory Committee,Ontario,Canada


The testing laboratory must have an established immunohistochemistry program with sufficient volume to maintain technical/professional knowledge and skill. (The UK guidelines recommend performance of 250 IHC and, if applicable, 100 FISH tests per year1). For Ontario, we recommend a minimum of 20 HER2/neu IHC tests per month or 240 HER2/neu tests per year.

The laboratory must have a quality assurance improvement program that provides for the required quality control and uses quality indicators to determine whether performance is meeting the quality standard.

At least one pathologist from each centre, involved in the reading and interpretation of
immunohistochemical preparations in situ hybridization for HER2/neu, must complete appropriate training.

Quality Assurance Requirements - To be read in conjunction with the Testing Algorithm Schematic
It is recommended that tissue be fixed with 10% phosphate buffered formalin (4% formaldehyde),pH 7.0. The optimal fixation time is 8 to 48 hours.
Antibodies currently used in Ontario include monoclonal antibody CBll (Novocastra), monoclonal antibody TAB250 (Zymed), polyclonal antibody A0485 (DAKO) and the HercepTest Kit (DAKO). Assays using these antibodies have been optimized and instructions must be followed precisely. Other appropriately validated antibodies may be used.

If immunohistochemical detection of HER2/neu is carried out using more than one antibody then the antibodies should be directed at different epitopes.

If the findings with the second IHC antibody remain equivocal/indeterminate, in-situ hybridization (FISH or chromogenic in-situ hybridization [CISH]) testing is required.

Controls using tissue and, if possible, cell lines demonstrating high, intermediate and low level HER2/neu amplification, should be run in parallel with patient testing. Patient tests must be repeated when the controls are non-conforming. The report should include an estimate of the % positive cells as well as intensity of staining. If the HercepTest kit is used, the recommended scoring system of 0-3+ should be reported as well as the percentage of positive cells.

The target turnaround time from receipt of the tissue block in the laboratory to report should be within one week and not longer than two weeks. The laboratory must confirm indeterminate IHC results using either FISH / CISH or arrange to have such confirmation carried out by a named referral laboratory that has agreed to provide this service.

Approximately 15 to 30% cases may require FISH. The laboratory must document and maintain a record of the number of patient samples processed and the number of positives, negatives and indeterminates. The percent positives should be calculated on a regular basis as one of the quality indicators.

REFERENCES
1. Ellis 10, Bartlett J, Dowsett M et al. Updated recommendations for HER2/neu testing in the UK. J Clin Pathol, 2004;57:233-237.
2. W. HannaF,P O'Malley. Updated recommendations from the HER2/neu consensus
meeting-Toronto, Ontario, September 2001. Current Oncology. 2002; 9 (Suppl. 1): S18-
S19.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Dear Prashant,
You have done excellent postings on this blog!!!
Please keep on posting such a valuable information to us.Its really useful.
Thanks.
Your friend
Dr.P Das
India

Anonymous said...

Cooments by :
http://www.tissuepathology.typepad.com/weblog/

New pathology blog -- Welcome to Oncopathology

Another blogging pathologist -- welcome to Dr. Prashnant A. Jani from Thunder Bay, Ontario at Oncopathology.

According to Dr. Jani, the purpose of the blog is to "post recent updates in Oncopathology as well as to evaluate the importance of Pathologist in management of cancer".

First entries on the blog appear to be meeting the purpose and looks like one worth following. His website is also worth a look as well.

montclair dermatology said...

Thank you so much for bringing up this very important matters. Keep posting!

sphin

Caverta said...

Worrying about breast cancer won’t work. Let us wake up to the alarm on increasing cancer cases and strive towards making more and more people know about it. I lost my husband last year. If only we could diagnose it earlier, he may have been with me today. Wear the pink ribbon and become a part of breast cancer awareness campaign. It’s time to act responsible and join hands to get over the fear of breast cancer by getting ourselves screened for it.

List of all the posts

Interesting Case

Clinical History:

53 years male,History of hypertension and tachycardia,MRI abdomen:-Left adrenal mass:- size 5.8 cm Right renal mass:- size-3.0cm Microscopic examination of the renal mass showed vascular tumor with diffuse sheets of clear cells having Fuhrman grade III nuclei. There was no evidence of necrosis within the tumor. There was no evidence of extraparenchymal invasion.
Gross examination of the left adrenal gland revealed cortically centered, solid and multinodular mass measuring 6.5 x 6.0 x 5.0 cm and weighing 122 grams. The tumor was encapsulated but showed evidence of extraparenchymal penetration. The tumor had golden brown cut surface with areas of hemorrhage and necrosis. The partial nephrectomy showed 3.0cm x 3.0cm x 3.0 cm yellow solid mass which did not invade into the perinephric adipose tissue.
Microscopically, the adrenal mass had predominant diffuse sheets and focal trabecular arrangements. The former pattern was present in about third of tumor. The cells had clear cytoplasm and round to ovoid nuclei with conspicuous nucleoli. Mitotic rate was 9/50 HPF and included atypical forms. Gross necrosis and capsular invasion were documented microscopically. There was no evidence of lymphovascular invasion. Considering the above mentioned features, a Weiss histopathologic score2 of 7/9 was applied.



Discussion:

The differential diagnosis included Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) with contralateral adrenal metastasis, Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) with contralateral renal metastasis, synchronous RCC and ACC or synchronous RCC and adrenocortical adenoma. A panel of immunohistochemical stains was performed to sort out the diagnosis. Adrenal tumor demonstrated strong Vimentin positivity and is negative for CK7, CK20, E1/AE3, EMA, Synaptophysin and S100.Renal cell carcinoma was positive for CK7, AE1/AE3, EMA (weak) and Vimentin. It was negative for CK20, Synaptophysin and S100. The difference of immunoprofile between the two tumors documented that they originated from two different primaries.

Final Diagnosis:

The diagnosis of synchronous RCC and ACC rather than metastasis influences the prognosis.

Prognosis:

The longest disease free interval after removal of contralateral adrenal metastasis was 12.1 years8 and the longest crude survival was 14.3 years. In contrast non metastazing RCC has an excellent prognosis if no metastasis developed.